Moon Landing Hoax....NOT

Mahomes said:
Yes I see it it seemed to take

The book Dark moon and the Apollo whistle blowers is like 380p. So there is 1-2k word article on each of the incidents that he says prove it false. I tried to get the book again from our library but they have none now ( thats a interesting story too)
Why not read through it 1st to see what I am talking of ? As I remember
A reporter from a Austrailian very remote tv station pursuaded the tracking station out in sparcely populated W Oz to broadcast the feed live and that happened only there, before it was relayed and of course cleaned up by nasa. It is gone. But there are many many things like this in the book
This event was what really started the faked discussion.
Click to expand...
Hey Mahomes, good to see you back. I think you might have missed a post I made.??
There was no tracking stations out in WA as far as I can tell in 1969,. And even if there was it would not work that way. Parks was the Southern Hemispheres dish that was used. Nowhere else in OZ did the relay to NASA. I am a Telstra tech, or was. The trunking would not work like that. Parks would pick it up on the dish and it would get relayed via normal (or secure) trunking back to the US. That would be underground cable in places, probably under sea cable as well.

And when you say cleaned up by NASA, how? It was a live feed. We would probably struggle now days with editing out a coke can on a live feed.
In 1969 we had nothing like the computing power to do that, not even close. Photo editing back then was done manually, 25 frames per second.

Leonardo divinci could not edit out thousands of frames manually perfectly enough to not leave remnants everywhere.
Also did you see the shot of the so called coke can and flask in higher resolution I posted? It was rocks and dirt.

And on a common sense note. Lets say for arguments sake it was all a hoax, on a movie set. Do you honestly believe that the two actors playing the astronauts, camera man, director, cast and crew would not have noticed a coke can and a drinking flask 1 meter from the flag? Prime position in the shot? Do you honestly thing they would have gone to that much trouble to create all these fake props, LEM, rocks dirt, and all the other stuff. But missed a coke can in the center of the frame???

It makes no sense at all. And as for evidence, one woman who can;t be verified or located. And the authors word that there were others??
Think about it mate. It makes no sense.
 
Also what about the 5 videos I posted by Mary Bennett and her crew. That is the Author of your book. Not one thing she and her cronies said was correct on those videos. It was as easy as pie to show she and her pal were completely wrong, using irrefutable science.
Have a look at my response to the videos, and tell me where I am wrong? Every point they made was nonscientific gobbledygook.
You can research my argument yourself and easily confirm they were wrong on the points she made. Go research the rebuttal yourself!
Show me where it i wrong.
 
The guy that worked for nasa on apollo says there was ! He layed it all out I heard of a few of his claims being explained away . not this one and ...and I remember how it went down in july to aug 69, like I said
 
Mahomes said:
The guy that worked for nasa on apollo says there was ! He layed it all out I heard of a few of his claims being explained away . not this one and ...and I remember how it went down in july to aug 69, like I said
Click to expand...
The Guy??? Which guy, name and what did he do, is he still alive today?
You remember what going down? I was there too, along with 600 Million people.
All of which missed seeing a coke can, other than our mystery woman in WA.

I give up Mahomas, like the flat earthers, if you were taken up to the moon and shown the landing site you would not change your views.
You have ignored every bit of evidence and science I have given you,
you have produced not a single scrap of evidence other than vague unsubstantiated claims.
Not a single bit of evidence, against all the science I have offered you.
This is pointless.
 
Here is the book some of it on google books
books.google.com

Dark Moon

As the dust settles on the 30th anniversary of Apollo 11, information is now coming to light that throws into serious doubt the authenticity of the Apollo record. New evidence clearly suggests that NASA hoaxed the photographs taken on the surface of the Moon. These disturbing findings are...
books.google.com
 
Like I said Mahomes,
If there was some new evidence the book presented, some new previously unknown facts I would buy it. I told you that. I believe in the truth. I am not one to believe in something because I like how it sounds. I looked at the author of the books claims in 5 videos, I have listened to what little you put forward, and there is no new evidence.
We had the Van Allen belt, nonsense, the radiation would kill them on the moon, all that nonsense about the cameras, the dark versus light argument, all clearly and unarguably debunked, and all from the author of your book. From you we had a repeat of the radiation nonsense, (wrong!), we had the transmissions were from WA (wrong!) we had UK was the only place with a big enough telescope (wrong!) we had the coke can in the shot (wrong! and nonsense as well.) So there is nothing new here.

You have read this book Mahomes, and I have presented in every case, science and facts to backup what I say. You have read the book, so show me with science where I or the scientists I refer to got it wrong. Not with vague references to a single person out of 600 million who can't be found.

Show me a fact!!!

And by the way, I found the book online after your first post. But thanks for the link in any case.

And, the other reason I am not wasting my time with t he book is this. By what I have seen so far, I am pretty confident it is going to be easy to shoot down the authors claims.

You have not acknowledged a single point I have made that has proved you wrong, not one. So I spent a couple of days reading your book, I take a few notes of the points being made. I come back here and show you with science why she is wrong.

And I will bet you will ignore everything I say anyway.
So why would I waste my time with it.
 
A couple of decades ago, I worked security at a major Aussie tourist attraction. I was on the night shift after the place was closed one night and was talking to an old bloke who was working on the computers in the behind the scenes area, he was also a sparky.
I knew this bloke pretty well from many late night conversations. He was very level headed and usually quite reserved.
A very straight up sort of bloke.
We got to talking about computers as I was doing a bit of code cutting back then, he started talking about the computers back in the day that were used to get the lads on Apollo 11 to the moon. The conversation wandered from topic to topic about Apollo, after a while I quizzed him how he new so much about the space program. He grinned and told me he worked at Tidbinbilla when they went to the moon. He told me all about the dish and how they had to track the craft and all sorts of interesting stuff.
I eventually I asked the big question, what did he know about UFO's.
He was a little hesitant at first, to I told him of a couple of my experiences to... I dunno go first I suppose.

He loosened up and started telling me about some UFO stories that happened on the A11 mission.
He went on to say that he heard first hand with his own ears the live transmission where Armstrong reported UFO;s lined up on the other side of i think he said crater? Not sure now. He recons Armstrong switched to another channel and asked mission control what he should do. they apparently replied "nothing, your about to talk live to a few hundred million people" so according to the bloke Armstrong switched back to the main channel and it was business as usual. This guy said he heard it first hand.
He told me a shit ton of stories about UFOs and Apollo, he said there is a shot that if you look hard in the reflection on the helmet of one of the astronauts you can see one of the UFO's. But you have to know which book and which photo becasue NASA realized the mistake and removed it. He said it is a hard one to find but its out there if you know where to look.
He went on to say that he eventually was lucky enough to meet the crew, i recon he said they did a bit iof a tour to thank the folks that helped get them home. He claims to have seen photo's of some pretty freaky UFO stuff that they had. He also say and held the originals (or copis of the originals) of the famous UFO out the window that Aldrin talks about. Only in his account the crew had no doubts that it was ET, and not panels. Which is what Aldrin alludes to nowadays.

I reckon the old guy would have to be dead now, i estimate he was in his 60s then.
I know it sounds a bit far fetched, and yes the old guy could have been having a lend of me. But I knew him pretty well at the time, and my in my judgement he was being trutheful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aurora
Top Bottom
Back