D
Dundee
Guest
Hey @Doc and anyone.
I was reading this....
When he says there outcomes are defined with higher and lower probabilities.
Is this due to the nature of the observer? I mean. If you were a god and new all things, And you were to look at a quantum particle for 1 unit of planks time. Would as an all knowing thing see the particles location at that smallest unit of time. In other words, not a probability. But a correct assesment of its location at that one instant.
And the probability aspect is only due to the limitations of the observer,
A poor analogy.
With the limits of my vision and reflexes you could come up with the probability of me identifying a flash card.
The card state is actually defined, but the probability of me getting it right is limited.
Is this the same for quantum particles?
I was reading this....
Quantum Darwinism, an Idea to Explain Objective Reality, Passes First Tests
Three experiments have vetted quantum Darwinism, a theory that explains how quantum possibilities can give rise to objective, classical reality.
getpocket.com
"Take, for example, the way a quantum particle can have a range of possible states, known as a “superposition.” This doesn’t really mean it is in several states at once; rather, it means that if we make a measurement we will see one of those outcomes. Before the measurement, the various superposed states interfere with one another in a wavelike manner, producing outcomes with higher or lower probabilities. "
When he says there outcomes are defined with higher and lower probabilities.
Is this due to the nature of the observer? I mean. If you were a god and new all things, And you were to look at a quantum particle for 1 unit of planks time. Would as an all knowing thing see the particles location at that smallest unit of time. In other words, not a probability. But a correct assesment of its location at that one instant.
And the probability aspect is only due to the limitations of the observer,
A poor analogy.
With the limits of my vision and reflexes you could come up with the probability of me identifying a flash card.
The card state is actually defined, but the probability of me getting it right is limited.
Is this the same for quantum particles?