Image: Commons
In a recent article on Scientific American, the former director of the Department of Defense’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), Dr. Kirkpatrick, expresses skepticism towards those pushing for UFO disclosure, suggesting a sensationalist angle. The article questions claims of a government cover-up and reverse engineering efforts without providing concrete evidence, leading to concerns in the UFO community about the author's motives and the integrity of the investigation.
As Dr. Kirkpatrick casually labels individuals as "conspiracists" and discredits their inquiries, the lack of acknowledgment for the government's long-standing secrecy on UFO matters only adds fuel to the fire. The author's commitment to scientific inquiry, while commendable, might inadvertently serve as a smokescreen to perpetuate the historical lack of transparency on UFO-related issues. Perhaps Kirkpatrick's dismissal of certain claims reflects a vested interest in maintaining a narrative consistent with the government's penchant for secrecy, leaving the true nature of UAP investigations shrouded in ambiguity.
Here's What I Learned as the U.S. Government's UFO Hunter
A forthcoming investigational report from an office of the Pentagon has found no evidence of aliens, only allegations circulated repeatedly by UFO claim advocates
