H
Check out this apparition over NYC, yo:
That might be Hal and Docs explanation hahaha kidding lads :)Maybe the cellphone was hallucinating haha
C'mon...it was Chinese candles for cryin' out loud.That might be Hal and Docs explanation hahaha kidding lads :)
Is the channeling option the most likely explanation do you think?But if the apparition isn't seen by others, then by definition it has to also be in the 'observers' mind. Where else can it be ?
The point is, is the mind channeling something going on someplace else ?
If the apparition is not seen by others then it's an hallucination by definition....but one can always argue and say they saw what they saw but it's not relevant if no one else was there.But if the apparition isn't seen by others, then by definition it has to also be in the 'observers' mind. Where else can it be ?
The point is, is the mind channeling something going on someplace else ?
So many factors could contribute to one person seeing something another did not. Viewpoint, state of mind, clarity of vision, and so on. You can't bundle up every situation where one person sees something and another does not as all being a hallucination.If the apparition is not seen by others then it's an hallucination by definition....but one can always argue and say they saw what they saw but it's not relevant if no one else was there.
The mind channeling is another issue not necessarily related to hallucination or apparition. It depends on the context of the discussion.
Yes..many factors could be involved in each instance. Without knowing the event and details it's hard making a call on what really happened and I think that's true for the ufo enigma as well.Each case should be looked at individually.So many factors could contribute to one person seeing something another did not. Viewpoint, state of mind, clarity of vision, and so on. You can't bundle up every situation where one person sees something and another does not as all being a hallucination.
Thats like saying all roses are red. This object is red therefore it is a rose
Wasn't Arnold also flying at the time...? Unless one was up there they might not see the same thing from the ground if at all.I can't bring it to mind at the moment, but I recall a sighting in Scotland where, within a group pf people, not all of them could see an object that a couple of them could.
If the object was a solid entity, shouldn't all of them have seen it ? They were together.
If you dig into history, back to Kenneth Arnold, It makes one wonder why it was accepted.
If I remember, no one else saw anything. No other reports.
And Arnold was some eighty mile from the Cascades where he said he say the objects. That's a long way even in clear mountain air.