D
If skeptics like West are correct, the government is guilty of an enormous failure of analysis. Indeed, mistaking mundane factors (such as balloons, drones, equipment malfunctions or optical illusions) for highly advanced craft would make for a shocking analytic misfire by the intelligence community.The world’s most passionate UFO skeptic versus the government
If skeptics like West are correct, the government is guilty of an enormous failure of analysis.thehill.com
1967 hey. Modern quote. So you agree with Azimov fom 1967 over all you have read in the many testimonials. As for the other bloke. He was quoting balloons. . So you agree do you if your rubbishing me."I don't believe in flying saucers... The energy requirements of interstellar travel are so great that it is inconceivable to me that any creatures piloting their ships across the vast depths of space would do so only in order to play games with us over a period of decades.
- "On Flying Saucers" in Is Anyone There? (1967), pp. 215–216 "
Maybe Dundee can bash Isaac Asimov while he's at it...
Not sure why you can't access that ....here are some main points....Interesting .
I get...
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access this resource.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
What did it say ?
No idea what it means, I just clicked on the link.
'UFOs are real' is the dumbest story of 2021. Seriously, we're not being visited by little green men
Taylor Noakes: People have reported seeing strange things since the dawn of time, but whereas people once thought they saw ghosts or monsters, today they see…nationalpost.com
Elizondo has said he has held in his hands material that was at the time of him seeing it, unknown and beyond our ability to make.Award-winning astronomer doubts UFOs ever crash-landed on Earth
Texas A&M astronomer Nick Suntzeff is dubious about the impending UFO report, saying if there was proof of aliens or UFOs, the government wouldn't have been able to keep it secret all these years.www.dailymail.co.uk
That you can produce as a citizen of earth. It was constructed using nanotechnology techniques that were beyond the capability at the time. It was in the Elizondo collection but yiu can go fiind it. Lol too many to re-watch. And as for 92 stable elements... Surely you are saying 92 that we know of at this time. Not there are definitely only 92 that make uo the universe. That would be the height of foolishness to assume thst is all there because we know if no other's. IDundee,
I worked for eight years at a metallurgy laboratory. We could tell you the atomic consistency of any material you wanted examining. There are only 92 stable elements.